REGIONS:

SUBSCRIBE:

Sign up for weekly updates

UN expert David Kaye calls on Internet access providers to respect free expression

During his official country visit to Japan, U.N. Special Rapporteur David Kaye speaks at a press conference in Tokyo, 19 April 2016
During his official country visit to Japan, U.N. Special Rapporteur David Kaye speaks at a press conference in Tokyo, 19 April 2016

AP Photo/Yuri Kageyama

This statement was originally published on article19.org on 12 June 2017.

ARTICLE 19 welcomes the report of the UN Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Expression, David Kaye, on the role of the private sector in the provision of Internet and telecommunications access. The report represents a milestone in the UN's efforts to promote the responsibilities of businesses to respect freedom of expression.

The Special Rapporteur presented the report, which States and other stakeholders then debated, at the 35th Session of the UN Human Rights Council (HRC) on 12 and 13 June 2017.

"Internet access has become a basic part of the exercise of many human rights. Today's report is a wake-up call that the fight for free expression is not just the responsibility of States but also the private sector," said Thomas Hughes, Executive Director at ARTICLE 19.

"For the first time, the UN expert has elaborated detailed standards on how digital access providers and industry bodies should respect freedom of expression and privacy online. Rather than promote purely commercial interests, the report also calls on States to put users' rights at the heart of internet access policy," Hughes added.

The Special Rapporteur's report begins by stressing the obligations of States to protect and promote freedom of expression online. In particular, the Special Rapporteur examines the various restrictions placed on Internet access by States, including Internet and telecommunications shutdowns, requests for access to user data, direct access to Internet and telecommunications networks, weakening of encryption, and paid prioritisation and zero-rating schemes that undermine net neutrality.

The Special Rapporteur calls on States and the Human Rights Council to:

  • Reiterate and elaborate on the standards in HRC resolution 32/13 on the internet and human rights, which unequivocally condemns measures to intentionally prevent or disrupt access to or dissemination of information online, in violation of international human rights law;
  • Recognise the connection between the rights to privacy and freedom of expression;
  • Emphasise the important role and need for protection of the private sector in providing digital access;
  • Promote the development of national action plans on business and human rights.
  • It also calls on States to prohibit the prioritisation of certain types of content and applications over others for commercial benefit.

The report goes on to examine the responsibilities of private actors to respect human rights in the provision of access to the Internet. The report details the role of telecommunications and Internet service providers, Internet exchange points, content delivery networks and network equipment vendors. The role of Standards Developing Organisations is examined in more depth in an Addendum.

As a starting point, the Special Rapporteur emphasises the importance of the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights as a minimum baseline for corporate human rights accountability. In assessing the context in which the digital access industry operates, the Special Rapporteur notes that:

  • Access providers supply a public good;
  • Restrictions on Internet access affect freedom of expression globally;
  • Industry is vulnerable to State pressure against freedom of expression;
  • But is also uniquely well-placed to ensure respect for users' rights.

The Special Rapporteur concludes that for the private sector to fulfil its responsibility to respect human rights, the digital access sector should allocate appropriate resources and commit to the principles of due diligence, human rights by design, stakeholder engagement, mitigation strategies, transparency and effective remedies.

In the Addendum to the report, the Special Rapporteur further calls for a more in-depth study of the human rights impact of technical standards and the role played by Standards Developing Organisations. In particular, the Special Rapporteur encourages developers and other stakeholders to be sensitive to the human rights implications of their work, including by encoding human rights values during the protocol design process where appropriate.

The presentation of the Special Rapporteur's report, and the responses of States and other stakeholders thereto, can be watched here (Human Rights Council, Regular Sessions, ID - SR on freedom of expression).


ARTICLE 19 SUBMISSION

ARTICLE 19 took part in the consultations organised by the Special Rapporteur ahead of this report. In our submission to the report, ARTICLE 19 noted the challenging legal framework within which Internet access providers must operate, from telecommunications' authorities broad powers to order Internet shutdowns or blocking of certain services to data localisation requirements. At the same time, we highlighted a serious lack of clarity when it came to the terms of service offered by Internet access providers. We also identified many areas where the telecommunications lobby has sought to undermine the rights of users, from undermining net neutrality to the rolling out of 5G.

ARTICLE 19 shares the conclusions of the Special Rapporteur on the role of the Internet access sector to respect human rights, in particular the rights to freedom of expression and privacy. The Special Rapporteur's recommendations correspond closely to those in ARTICLE 19's policy "Getting connected: Freedom of expression, telcos and ISPs", to be launched at an HRC side event on 14 June. We recommend that telcos and ISPs should ensure that in their operations, they embody the fundamental principles of a human rights-based approach, including respect for human rights, participation, empowerment, non-discrimination and equality and accountability.

We also encourage Standards Developing Organisations to continue assessing the human rights impact of their work.

Following the presentation of the Special Rapporteur's report at HRC 35, we call on States to act to bring their laws and practices in line with its recommendations, and for private companies to increase their efforts to respect freedom of expression on privacy online. We also calls on HRC states, in particular supporters of the Internet and Human Rights resolution, to integrate stronger standards on States' obligations and private sector responsibilities into HRC resolutions in this field.


COUNTRY VISITS

Alongside the presentation of his annual thematic report, the Special Rapporteur also presented reports on his official country visits to Tajikistan (March 2016), Japan (April 2016), and Turkey (November 2016).

We call on the governments of Japan, Turkey and Tajikistan to fully implement the Special Rapporteur's recommendations following his country visits. ARTICLE 19, PEN International and other human rights organisations have called on States at HRC35 to condemn the recent crackdown on freedom of expression in Turkey, and promote the Special Rapporteur's recommendations.

We further call on countries with outstanding requests for official visits from the Special Rapporteur to make arrangements for the completion of these visits without further delay.

Latest Tweet:

What are #UN resolutions and how can they help you fight for #JournalistSafety? 5 things you need to know.… https://t.co/Upi1oF5mmQ