Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF)

Articles by Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF)

Elections are partisan affairs. Election security isn’t

EFF was profoundly disturbed by reports that the White House was pressuring Chris Krebs, director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), to change CISA’s reports on election security.

Content moderation and the U.S. election: What to ask, what to demand

It’s not clear that social media played a more significant role than many other factors in the 2016 election, including traditional media. But the techlash is real enough.

Why getting paid for your data is a bad deal

One bad privacy idea that won’t die is the so-called “data dividend,” which imagines a world where companies have to pay you in order to use your data. Sound too good to be true? It is.

Thank you for your transparency report, here’s everything that’s missing

There is a difference between corporately sanctioned ‘transparency,’ which is inherently limited, and meaningful transparency that empowers users to understand Facebook’s actions and hold the company accountable.

Things to know before your neighborhood installs an automated license plate reader

Local groups often turn to license plate readers thinking that they will protect their community from crime. But the truth is, these cameras – which record every license plate coming in and out of the neighborhood – may create more problems than they solve.

One database to rule them all: The invisible content cartel that undermines freedom of expression online

GIFCT has the potential to have a massive (and disproportionate) negative impact on the freedom of expression of certain communities.

Proctoring apps subject students to unnecessary surveillance

No student should be forced to make the choice to either hand over their biometric data and be surveilled continuously or to fail their class.

EU Court again rules that NSA spying makes US companies inadequate for privacy

The European Union’s highest court made clear – once again – that the US government’s mass surveillance programs are incompatible with the privacy rights of EU citizens.