(FXI/IFEX) – The following is a 14 March 2007 FXI press release: SANEF, MISA-SA & FXI Concerns over parliamentary processing of Films & Publications Amendment Bill without consultation with the media The SA National Editors’ Forum, SA Chapter of the Media Institute of Southern Africa and the Freedom of Expression Institute are shocked by the […]
(FXI/IFEX) – The following is a 14 March 2007 FXI press release:
SANEF, MISA-SA & FXI
Concerns over parliamentary processing of Films & Publications Amendment Bill without consultation with the media
The SA National Editors’ Forum, SA Chapter of the Media Institute of Southern Africa and the Freedom of Expression Institute are shocked by the reported announcement by Patrick Chauke, chairman of the parliamentary Home Affairs Committee, that he plans parliamentary hearings for the Films and Publications Amendment Bill soon so that the Bill can come before parliament within the next three months.
The three media organisations believe this undertaking by Chauke is contrary to the promise made by Minister in the Presidency Essop Pahad and Home Affairs Minister Ms Nosiviwe Mapisa-Nquakula and Deputy Minister Malusi Gigaba that there would be extensive consultation with stakeholders before the Bill was presented to parliament. It also conflicts with the decision to set up technical committees to investigate ways in which the ministry’s aims could be met without undermining Constitutional guarantees of Press freedom.
The media vigorously protested at the first draft of the Bill last year pointing out that it introduced the prospect of pre-publication censorship which was counter to the media freedom guarantees in the Constitution, apart from the practical difficulties that would arise for the distribution of newspapers, and that there had been no consultation with the media beforehand.
The media organisations believe that the Bill should be withdrawn and a consultative conference be held to discuss how the ministry’s objectives which are directed at eliminating the dangers of child pornography can be achieved. The media has also noted with deep concern the statement reported in the Sunday Times that Home Affairs Deputy Minister Malusi Gigaba remains convinced that the media has to be regulated to limit child pornography and the exposure of children to pornography.
The three media organisations point out that there is no record of newspapers or news broadcasters having contravened the common law crime of displaying child pornography or of exposing children to pornography and caution the deputy minister that attempts by the state to regulate publication constitute censorship and an offence against the Constitution.
The media organisations point out that since the meetings with Minister Pahad and the Home Affairs Ministry in October last year there has been no attempt to set up a consultative process with the media.
They call on the ministry to institute an immediate comprehensive consultation over the Bill’s provisions preferably with the Bill withdrawn so that the discussions are not constrained by its provisions.
