(RSF/IFEX) – RSF welcomes the dismissal of a lawsuit against French radio journalist Daniel Mermet and his boss, Jean-Marie Cavada, head of the Radio France network, by a Paris court on 12 July 2002. The judge said the allegations of “incitement to racial hatred” and “racial slander” against Mermet, and by extension Cavada, were unfounded, […]
(RSF/IFEX) – RSF welcomes the dismissal of a lawsuit against French radio journalist Daniel Mermet and his boss, Jean-Marie Cavada, head of the Radio France network, by a Paris court on 12 July 2002.
The judge said the allegations of “incitement to racial hatred” and “racial slander” against Mermet, and by extension Cavada, were unfounded, because an account of a conflict situation “inevitably includes the voicing of preferences.” The court determined that there was no proof indicating that the journalist was guilty of anti-Semitism.
Mermet was sued by the French Union of Jewish Students, the French League Against Racism and Anti-Semitism and lawyer William Goldnadel for broadcasting remarks from listeners in the course of a series of reports from Gaza and Israel. They have appealed the judge’s ruling.
RSF supported Mermet and called for the dropping of all legal action against him. Over 25,000 people signed an appeal backing him, entitled “Do we have the right to criticise Sharon?” which was published in the French weekly magazine “Le Nouvel Observateur” on 19 June. The appeal was also broadcast on Mermet’s radio programme, “Là-bas si j’y suis” (“Life on the Other Side”).
The appeal criticised the defamation campaign and threats against journalists and media outlets in recent months by persons accusing them of being biased in their reporting of the Middle East conflict.
“Small groups and individuals daring to claim they speak for all Jews are playing on fear and confusion and, when the slightest criticism of Israeli policy is made, come out with the charge of anti-Semitism,” the appeal said. “This dangerously devalues the fight against anti-Semitism and hatred of Jews by systematically and improperly brandishing it on every occasion. (…) If Mermet’s programme was anti-Semitic, then anti-Semitism is everywhere. (…) We reject these lunatic accusations and exaggerated suspicions, this serious perversion of public debate and this cheapening of anti-Semitism,” the appeal said.
